The principles and limitations of current imaging modalities are described. It may help to determine the most effective radiologic technique, minimizing the cost of examination as well as the exposure to radiation. It is important to choose the appropriate mo-duality for specific types of orthopedic abnormalities. It is important to reemphasize that conventional radiography remains the most effective tool for demon-starting a bone and joint abnormality.
Use of radiological techniques differs in evaluating the presence, type, and extent of various bone, joint, and soft-tissue abnormalities. Therefore, both the radiologist and orthopedic surgeon must know the in-dictation for use of each technique, the limitations of a particular modality, and the appropriate imaging approaches for abnormalities at specific sites. The question; "what modality should I use for this particular problem?" is frequently asked by radiologists and or-thopedic surgeons. Although numerous algorithms are available to evaluate various problems at different anatomic sites, the answer cannot always be clearly stated.
The choice of techniques for imaging bone and soft-tissue abnormalities is dictated not only by clinical presentation, but also by equipment availability, ex-parties, and cost. Restriction may also be imposed by the needs of individual patients. Most of the time, the choice of imaging technique is dictated by the type of suspected abnormality. The purpose of this study was to review imaging techniques in ORTHOPEDICS.